In chapter three, Apologetic Method: Evaluating Worldviews, Groothius states that apologetics means philosophical engagement, and philosophy trades on logic. Groothius provides a brief discussion on some basis logical principles. Groothius believes in the laws of logic which are not just good ideas.
Read moreReview of Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith by Douglas Groothuis
In chapter two, The Biblical Basis for Apologetics, Groothuis states that “the task in this chapter is to tighten up our understanding of apologetics by explaining its basis in Scripture.”
Christian apologetics is the rational defense of the Christian worldview as objectively true, rationally compelling, and existentially or subjectively engaging. The word apologetics comes from the Greek word apologia…. In the days of the NT “an apologia was a formal courtroom defense of something (2 Timothy 4:16) …. The term is used specifically for a rational defense of the gospel in three texts: Philippians 1:7, 16, and most famously in 1 Peter 3:15-16.”
Read moreReview of Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith by Douglas Groothuis
In chapter one, Introduction: Hope, Despair, and Knowing Reality, Groothuis states that “the very concept of objective truth is under fire today.” Yet without a belief in objective truth men die in despair. The late psychiatrist Victor Frankl who was a prisoner in Hitler’s death camps wrote “The gas chambers of Auschwitz, Treblinda, and Maidanek were ultimately prepared….at the desks and in the lecture halls of nihilistic scientists and philosopher.” Frankl noted that those captives with a sense of meaning that reached beyond their immediate experiences maintained hope and dignity, even in the Nazi hell. Those without the benefit of this conviction tended to atrophy and die in the pressure cooker of evil, even if they were spared the gas chambers.
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics by William Lane Craig
In chapter eight, Craig answers the question, “How credible, then, is the New Testament witness to the resurrection of Jesus?” Craig argues that the apologetic arguments used against eighteenth century opponents of the resurrection are not effective today against modern biblical critics.
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics By William Lane Craig
In chapter seven, The Self-Understanding of Jesus, Craig states that “at the center of any Christian apologetic therefore must stand the person of Christ; and very important for the doctrine of Christ’s person are the personal claims of the historical Jesus. Did he claim to be divine?....Who did Jesus of Nazareth claim to be?”
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics By William Lane Craig
In chapter six, The Problem of Miracles, Craig states that some skeptics today consider Biblical miracles a pre-scientific, superstitious worldview belonging to the ancient and middle ages. Some theologians like Rudolf Bultmann sought to demythologize the Bible of miracles and rid it of this stumbling block.
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics By William Lane Craig
In chapter five, The Problem of Historical Knowledge, Craig defends the importance of history to Christianity in light of the popular and scholarly rejection of history. Craig traces historiography as a science. Historiography is defined as "the study of the way history has been and is written – the history of historical writing", which means that, "When you study 'historiography' you do not study the events of the past directly, but the changing interpretations of those events in the works of individual historians" (The Methods and Skills of History: A Practical Guide, 1988, p. 223, ISBN 0-88295-982-4). In the Medieval Period (fifth to the eleventh century), historiography waned greatly. Anselm, therefore, defended Christianity largely from the Biblical text itself.
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics By William Lane Craig
In chapter four The Existence of God (part 2) Dr. Craig elaborates on the teleological argument, moral argument, and the ontological argument for the existence of God. At the end of the chapter, Dr. Craig states “In my experience, the moral argument is the most effective argument for the existence of God.” I want to summarize Craig’s moral argument for the existence of God.
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics By William Lane Craig
In chapter three The Existence of God, Craig states that conventional wisdom says it is impossible to prove the existence of God and that, therefore, if we are going to believe in God, we must except it by faith that God exists.
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics By William Lane Craig
In chapter two, The Absurdity of Life without God, Craig grapples with “the human predicament” or the significance of human life in a post-theistic universe. One of the early apologetists dealing with the human predicament was Blaise Pascal (1623-1662). He emphasized both the miserableness and greatness of man. Man is miserable without God for he has no significance or even certainty as to why he exists. Yet man does not seek to know God and thus the meaning of life. Man is also great in that he can recognize his misery and do something about it. This led to Pascal's Wager argument. When the odds that God exists are even, then the prudent man will wager that God exists. “For if you win, you win all; if you lose, you lose nothing” (Pensees, 343).
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics by William Lane Craig
In chapter one, How To I Know Christianity Is True? Craig says this question can better be answered by briefly surveying some of the most representative thinkers of the past.
Read moreReview of Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics By William Lane Craig
In the Introduction, Dr. Craig says his book is answering the question, “What rational warrant can be given for Christian faith?” Of course, that question can be answered with apologetics. To opponents of apologetics who say, “Nobody comes to Christ through apologetics because people are not won by arguments” Craig gives three vital roles of apologetics.
Read moreMartin Luther's View of Infant Baptism
This review of Sola Fide Compromised? Martin Luther and the doctrine of Baptism by Patrick Ramsey (in Themelios 34.2, 2009: 179-193) is going to be shocking to some. D. Patrick Ramsey believes it is arguable that “Luther’s own doctrine of justification by faith alone is compromised by or at least in tension with his doctrine of baptism, particularly his understanding of baptismal regeneration.” Ramsey states that “this paper will argue that Luther’s doctrine of baptism is inconsistent with his doctrine of justification by faith alone.” Ramsey, a Presbyterian, is not alone. Southern Baptist theologian John S. Hammett writes, “In fact, Luther, on other issues challenged tradition in the name of Scripture, used tradition to argue for infant baptism against the Anabaptists: “Were child baptism now wrong God would certainly not have permitted it to continue so long, nor let it become so universally and thoroughly established in all Christendom” (Biblical Foundations for Baptist Churches. 267).
Read moreMartin Luther King's Systematic Theology
We greatly admire King's sacrificial labor for the Civil Rights Movement. I recently visited Montgomery, Alabama and stood at the bus stop where Rosa Clark courageously refused to move to the back of the bus. I also walked the bridge at Selma, where protesters were inhumanly beaten. At the same time, we can not be oblivious to King's, as Joe Carter, at The Gospel Coalition, describes, "unorthodox view of theology."
Read morePostmillennialism and Christian Reconstructionism
Gary North and Gary DeMar in the Christian Reconstruction Movement take social justice to another level. They teach that the church should practice social justice to reconstruct society in order to bring in the kingdom.
Read moreThe "M" Word by Dr. Charles Petitt
“I remember the first time you came to my door. You were probably trying to tell me about Christ, but I didn’t hear anything you were saying. All I could think about was the fact that a white American was in my house. Sometime later you came again, and I remember thinking to myself, ‘Does he really believe that anyone in this village is dumb enough to attend the white man’s church? Is he totally unaware of our history of slavery and what the Americans and Europeans did to our ancestors?’ Then over the next several months you came back again and again. And I kept thinking to myself, ‘he may be dumb but he is persistent!’ Finally, I actually heard what you were saying and realized my need for Christ.”
The testimony that evening was similar to so many others we heard during our decade in the West Indies. Even though we lived in the middle of the village, tried to adopt local culture, interacted with nationals every week, and worked hard to understand the Vincentian dialect, we couldn’t escape the “outsiders” label and the suspicions and mistrust so often associated with that tag. Even worse, we were missionaries. It didn’t take long to learn that the “M” word should be avoided. It often made people feel more like projects than peers, and I discovered that people everywhere prefer parity over charity. The “M” word also conjured visions of colonialism and missionaries working in lockstep with slave owners to keep the slaves brainwashed. Several Vincentians informed me that the white man’s Bible said things like, “servants obey your masters.” In addition to the normal resistance to the gospel, there were endless “outsider” obstacles that had to be overcome every single time I met anyone.
Read moreThe Six Marks of Leadership, Mark Six, Part 3 “He Handles More Outside Opposition” (Nehemiah 6:1-14)
It helps to have a sense of humor.
Spurgeon would occasionally find a nasty anonymous letter lying on his pulpit when he would stand up to preach. There would a letter but no name. One day he got to the pulpit and there was a piece of paper with one word written in large letters … “idiot” … So, Spurgeon said, “Normally I get letters without signatures, but today I got a signature without a letter.”
Read moreThe Six Marks of Leadership, Mark Six, Part 2 “Leaders Handle Inside Opposition” (Nehemiah 5:1-19)
This classified advertisement appeared in a rural New York newspaper: “Farmer, age 38, wishes to meet woman about 30 who owns tractor. Please enclose picture of tractor.” I often wonder if this selfish farmer got pictures of John Deere tractors from desperate women. Nehemiah was also dealing with believers who also valued possessions over important relationships.
Read moreTen Vital Steps For Calling a Pastor to Your Church
Jack Hyles wrote an article entitled The Science of Calling a Pastor. In this article intended on instructing churches on how to call a pastor he wrote:
Choose someone who is not a Bible expositor. There is not one expository sermon in the Bible. All of them are topical. I am not fighting expository preaching, but that kind of preaching will destroy a great church. Do not be swayed by their suave teaching. The great soul-winning churches have been pastored by topical preaching. I am not talking about evangelistic churches; I mean soul-winning churches! If you want a soul-winning church, you must call a pastor who preaches topical sermons. Many of our once great soul-winning churches fell prey to the popular notion of expository preaching. They decided that they wanted more Bible, but when they got it, it cost them their effective soul winning.
Read moreThe Six Marks of Leadership, Mark Six, Part 1 (Cont.) “The Leaders Handle Outside Opposition” (Nehemiah 4:10-23)
The criticism, insults, and threats finally took their toll on Nehemiah’s workers and discouragement set in. What caused their discouragement? They focused on their weaknesses, the rubbish of the torn down wall, their inabilities, and the enemy instead of concentrating on wall that would protect them, their families who needed their ministry, what they already accomplished, and the Lord who was great and awesome.
Read more